Comments

‘There’s No Place for Them to Go’: I.C.U. Beds Near Capacity Across U.S.Skip to Comments
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.

‘There’s No Place for Them to Go’: I.C.U. Beds Near Capacity Across U.S.

Share of I.C.U. beds occupied
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
No data

Use two fingers to pan and zoom. Tap for details.

Source: New York Times analysis of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services data.·Note: Shows 7-day average patient count by hospital service area.

In El Paso, hospitals reported that just 13 of 400 intensive care beds were not occupied last week. In Fargo, N.D., there were just three. In Albuquerque, there were zero.

More than a third of Americans live in areas where hospitals are running critically short of intensive care beds, federal data show, revealing a newly detailed picture of the nation’s hospital crisis during the deadliest week of the Covid-19 epidemic.

Hospitals serving more than 100 million Americans reported having fewer than 15 percent of intensive care beds still available as of last week, according to a Times analysis of data reported by hospitals and released by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Many areas are even worse off: One in 10 Americans — across a large swath of the Midwest, South and Southwest — lives in an area where intensive care beds are either completely full, or fewer than 5 percent of beds are available. At these levels, experts say maintaining existing standards of care for the sickest patients may be difficult or impossible.

“There’s only so much our frontline care can offer, particularly when you get to these really rural counties which are being hit hard by the pandemic right now,” said Beth Blauer, director of the Centers for Civic Impact at Johns Hopkins University.

Sharp increases in Covid-19 patients can overwhelm smaller hospitals, she said. “This disease progresses very quickly and can get very ugly very fast. When you don’t have that capacity, that means people will die.”

The new dataset, released on Monday, marks the first time the federal government has published detailed geographic information on Covid-19 patients in hospitals, something public health officials have long said would be crucial to responding to the epidemic and understanding its impact.

Where hospitals are at capacity

High-population areas
All hospital service areas
Covid patients
per 100k ▼
I.C.U. Covid patients
per 100k
Hospital
occupancy
I.C.U.
occupancy
National Average 30 5 59% 72%
White Plains, N.Y. 175 31 79% 79%
Troy, Mich. 135 15 79% 87%
Abington, Pa. 132 30 77% 102%
Fort Thomas, Ky. 121 31 146% 82%
Amarillo, Texas 117 42 78% 94%
Saginaw, Mich. 117 23 98% 99%
Oak Lawn, Ill. 112 23 71% 78%
Paterson, N.J. 110 17 71% 50%
Jonesboro, Ark. 109 28 78% 94%
Altoona, Pa. 103 19 94% 94%
Note: Locations shown represent hospital service areas, and the national averages are of service areas where data exist. Percentages above 100 may occur when hospitals report patients beyond their normal limits.

Hospitalization figures collected by the Covid Tracking Project show that the number of people hospitalized with the virus nationwide has doubled since the beginning of November. But existing state-level figures have obscured vast differences within states, making it difficult to recognize local hot spots.

The new data shows that some areas — like Amarillo, Texas, Coral Gables, Fla., and Troy, Mich. — are seeing rates of serious illness from Covid-19 that approach the levels seen in New York City during the worst weeks of the spring.

Covid-19 patients per 100,000 people
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
No data

Use two fingers to pan and zoom. Tap for details.

Political leaders in many states are ramping up measures to try to slow the spread. Last week, California issued stay-at-home orders for regions where hospitals surpassed 85 percent intensive care occupancy. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, where I.C.U.s are full across the state, is expected to soon announce that hospitals can ration care based on who is most likely to survive.

Doctors and researchers said the shortages are already causing serious damage.

In North Dakota, which for weeks this fall had the worst rate of infection per capita in the country, the number of unoccupied I.C.U. beds across the whole state at times dipped into the single digits in early November. In the small city of Minot, the local hospital, Trinity Health, devoted more than an entire floor of its six-floor hospital to coronavirus patients.

Other North Dakota hospitals would normally accept transfers to help ease the burden, but when Dr. Jeffrey Sather, chief of medical staff, called around for help, he found that everywhere else was also full.

Patients kept coming, piling up in his emergency room. “There’s no place for them to go,” he said at the time.

Survival rates from the disease have improved as doctors have learned which treatments work. But hospital shortages could reverse those gains, risking the possibility of increasing mortality rates once again as patients cannot receive the level of care they need.

Thomas Tsai, an assistant professor of health policy at Harvard University, said that when resources are critically constrained, healthcare workers already facing burnout are forced to make emotionally wrenching decisions about who receives care.

There is some evidence physicians are already limiting care, Dr. Tsai said. For the last several weeks, the rate at which Covid-19 patients are going to hospitals has started decreasing. “That suggests that there’s some rationing and stricter triage criteria about who gets admitted as hospitals remain full,” he said.

In California, where a shortage of hospital beds triggered a lockdown in much of the state by Monday, hospital workers are bracing for the next few months. More than 10,000 Covid-19 patients are now hospitalized in the state, more than 70 percent above levels of two weeks ago, and the effects of the Thanksgiving holiday may not have been fully felt yet.

At the University of California San Diego Medical Center, just nine intensive care beds were unoccupied on Monday. The mood in the hospital was one of resignation, said Dr. Chris Longhurst, associate chief medical officer. For months, health workers have watched much of the public ignore their advice to take precautions and avoid the spread of the virus, he said, and now, inevitably, they are seeing ever more people arriving sick at their door.

“A lot of healthcare workers have been concerned about this, about the lack of compliance, and now we’re seeing it play out, and you just sort of feel resigned,” he said. “You’ve got to go to work every day and help the people who need hospital care, but we wish that it had stopped upstream.”

So far, policymakers have relied heavily on data on testing and cases to make policy decisions, including whether schools and businesses should remain open. But the new, detailed data on hospitals may lead to a rapid shift in what leaders consider as they make decisions, Ms. Blauer, of Johns Hopkins, said.

“If you’re living in a place where there’s no I.C.U. bed for 100 miles, you have to be incredibly careful about the social interaction that you allow the community to take,” she said.

友情链接:葡京官方|葡京注册网址  葡京捕鱼|电玩城官网  葡京真人  葡京官网_葡京在线_葡京平台网址  葡京捕鱼-官网首页  王者荣耀赛事竞猜_电子竞技下注app_【平台游戏】  电子游艺娱乐平台|电子娱乐游戏网站  电子游戏下载app|电子游戏网站  葡京平台_葡京官方网址  葡京注册|葡京开户网站